Filter results
You can narrow down the results using the filters
Content type
Gene Technology Ministers’ Meeting – Communique – July 2021
This document is a summary of the Gene Technology Ministers’ Meeting (GTMM) held on Tuesday 20 July 2021.
2017 review – Decision regulation impact statement
This decision regulation impact statement outlines 3 policy options to implement the recommendations of the third review of the National Gene Technology Scheme.
2017 review – Updated action plan 2020–2023
This updated action plan for implementing recommendations from the 2017 of the National Gene Technology Scheme takes into account changes arising from the 2020 review of COAG councils and ministerial forms.
2017 review – Consultation regulation impact statement and explanatory paper – Frequently asked questions
This fact sheet contains a selection of questions and answers that address key issues raised during information sessions. The information sessions covered the consultation regulation impact statement and explanatory paper – part of the 2017 review of the National Gene Technology Scheme.
Legislative and Governance Forum on Gene Technology – Communique – 11 December 2020
This communique outlines the outcomes from the meeting held on 11 December 2020. The forum is now known as the Gene Technology Ministers’ Meeting.
Gene Technology Ministers’ Meeting – Communiques
This collection contains communiques from the Gene Technology Ministers’ Meeting, previously named the Legislative Governance Forum on Gene Technology.
2017 review – Issues paper submissions
The National Gene Technology Scheme received these submissions for a consultation on an issues paper titled ‘Implementing recommendations of the third review of the Gene Technology Scheme: phase one’. It excludes those made on a confidential basis. Submissions closed on 4 December 2019.
2017 review – Issues paper – Submission – CropLife Australia
CropLife Australia sent this submission for the Issues paper consultation of the third review directly by the Gene Technology secretariat.
2017 review – Issues paper – Submission – Gene Ethics and Friends of the Earth Australia
Gene Ethics and Friends of the Earth Australia sent a joint submission for the Issues paper consultation of the third review directly by the Gene Technology secretariat.
2017 review – Issues paper – Submission – Australian Seed Federation
The Australian Seed Federation sent this submission for the Issues paper consultation of the third review directly by the Gene Technology secretariat.
2017 review – Issues paper – Submission – BASF
BASF sent this submission for the Issues paper consultation of the third review directly by the Gene Technology secretariat.
2017 review – Issues paper – Submission – La Trobe University's IBC
La Trobe University's Institutional Biosafety Committee sent this second submission for the Issues paper consultation of the third review directly by the Gene Technology secretariat. Their first submission was lodged via the Consultation Hub.
2017 review – Implementation strategy
This strategy provides a high-level annual strategy for implementing the 2017 review of the National Gene Technology Scheme’s action plan over a 5-year period.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – Friends of the Earth Australia campaign
Friends of the Earth Australia sent submissions for the phase 3 consultation of the third review gathered through a campaign. These submissions were collated and sent directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Phase 3 consultation submissions
The National Gene Technology Scheme received these submissions for the third consultation phase of the third review. It excludes those made on a confidential basis. Submissions to this consultation phase closed on 24 May 2018.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – Agribusiness Australia
Agribusiness Australia sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – Australian Seed Federation
The Australian Seed Federation sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – Civil Society Groups
Civil Society Groups sent a joint submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – CropLife Australia
CropLife Australia sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development
Western Australia's Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – GrainGrowers
GrainGrowers sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – Grain Trade Australia
Grain Trade Australia sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – La Trobe University's IBC
La Trobe University's Institutional Biosafety Committee sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – National Genomics Policy Framework Project
The National Genomics Policy Framework Project's Reference Group sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.
2017 review – Consultation phase 3 – Submission – NSW Health
NSW Health sent this submission for the phase 3 consultation of the third review directly to the secretariat.